People v. Murphy CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 24, 2016F070891California711 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/24/16 P. v. Murphy CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

F070891

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. F99627147-2) v.

ANDRE LAMONT MURPHY, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Jonathan B. Conklin, Judge. Rachel Lederman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

-ooOoo-

* Before Poochigian, Acting P.J., Detjen, J. and Peña, J. Appointed counsel for defendant Andre Lamont Murphy asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.