People v. Tygenhof CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 25, 2016C078298California3,409 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/25/16 P. v. Tygenhof CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado) ----

THE PEOPLE, C078298

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. P09CRF0256)

v.

RYAN TYGENHOF,

Defendant and Appellant.

As a condition of the trial court’s grant of probation, defendant Ryan Tygenhof was ordered to pay $37,004.56 in victim restitution. Upon completion of the four-year probationary term, defendant filed a petition to dismiss pursuant to Penal Code section 1203.4.1 The trial court denied the petition on the basis of defendant’s failure to pay the full amount of victim restitution. On appeal, defendant contends payment of victim restitution was not a condition of probation and thus the trial court erred in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.