United States v. Fernando Zatarain-Pena

Good Law
656 F. App'x 377
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 201614-50163California218 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Fernando Zatarain-Pena appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 44-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of methamphetamine and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate and remand for resentencing.

Zatarain-Pena argues that the district court erred in denying a minor role reduction to his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). After Zatarain-Pena was sentenced, the United States Sentencing Commission issued Amendment 794 (“the Amendment”), which amended the commentary to the minor role Guideline. The Amendment is retroactive to cases pending on direct appeal. See United States v. Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d 519, 523 (9th Cir. 2016).

Among other things, the Amendment added a non-exhaustive list of factors that a court “should consider” in determining whether to apply a minor role reduction. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C) (2015). Because we cannot determine from the record whether the district court considered all of those factors in determining whether Zatarain-Pena was entitled to a minor role adjustment, we vacate Zatarain-Pena’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.