Ramiro Vela v. Lisa Walsh
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 201615-15432California241 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AUG 25 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
RAMIRO VELA, No. 15-15432
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:13-cv-00227-RCJ-VPC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LISA WALSH; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 16, 2016**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Ramiro Vela, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s
summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference
to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.