People v. Wilson CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 2016D069709California166 words

Opinion

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings below. She presented no argument for reversal, but identified the following

issues that "might arguably support the appeal" (Anders, supra, 386 U.S. at p. 744)

whether: (1) sufficient evidence supported the jury's convictions; (2) trial counsel

provided ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to object to the jury being able to

handle and manipulate the gun and magazine during deliberations; and (3) the electronic

search conditions of probation were unconstitutionally overbroad and vague. We offered

defendant the opportunity to file a brief on his own behalf, and he has not responded.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436

and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the issues referred to by appellate counsel,

has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Competent counsel has

represented Wilson on this appeal.

3

DISPOSITION

The judgment (order granting formal probation) is affirmed.

MCCONNELL, P. J.

WE CONCUR:

HALLER, J.

O'ROURKE, J.

4