Cottone

Cottone v. Cottone CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 2016G051676California3,848 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aronson, J.

Filed 8/26/16 Cottone v. Cottone CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

BRANDI COTTONE,

G051676

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2010-00335370) v.

OPINION

JEANIE LYNN COTTONE,

Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, David T. McEachen, Judge. Affirmed. Rosen Saba, James R. Rosen and Elizabeth L. Bradley for Plaintiff and Appellant. Inglis, Ledbetter, Gower & Warriner, Richard S. Gower and Gregory J. Bramlage for Defendant and Respondent. * * * Following a jury verdict in her favor against her uncle, Lee Cottone, on several negligence and intentional tort causes of action for sexually abusing her when she was a young girl, Brandi Cottone appeals the trial court’s earlier summary judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.