In re Z.G. CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2016B270459California1,605 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

H.H. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdiction and disposition orders finding his minor daughter, Z.G., a dependent child of the juvenile court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a), (b), and (j),1 and placing Z.G. “home of the parents.” Father contends that the juvenile court abused its discretion in repeatedly continuing dependency proceedings, resulting in a delayed dispositional hearing. We agree with the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (the Department) that the appeal should be dismissed as moot.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Department became involved with A.G. (mother), her two children (three- year-old Z.G. and six-month-old Z.A.) and Z.A.’s father, A.A., based on an allegation of domestic violence between mother and A.A.2 Father is Z.G.’s father. On January 26, 2015, the Department filed a section 300 petition alleging domestic violence between mother and A.A. Father’s identity was unknown at that time. Mother told the Department that she only knew father as “Pookie,” but he died before Z.G. was born. On that same date, the Department reported “the current whereabouts” of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.