Darling

Darling v. Redwine CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 2016F071429California5,981 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/30/16 Darling v. Redwine CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

BRADFORD DARLING,

F071429

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. S-1500-CV-279420) v.

DEBRA L. REDWINE, OPINION Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. David R. Lampe, Judge. Law Office of Timothy L. Kleier, Timothy L. Kleier; Pape & Shewan and Scott R. Shewan for Plaintiff and Appellant. Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Cooper, Rosenlieb & Kimball, Catherine E. Bennett, Joseph D. Hughes and Kurt D. VanSciver for Defendant and Respondent. -ooOoo- Plaintiff appeals from the judgment in his declaratory relief action, which sought a determination of the ownership of six investment accounts held by decedent in trust…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.