Bacilio Ruiz Torres v. Mercer Canyons Inc.

Bad Law
835 F.3d 1125·2016 WL 4537378·95 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1022·2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 16106
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 201615-35615California6,768 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

Defendant Mercer Canyons, Inc. (Mercer) appeals the district court’s order certifying a class of domestic farm workers, represented by Bacilio Ruiz Torres and Jose Amador (collectively, Plaintiffs). Mercer operates a fruit and vegetable farm near Prosser, Washington. In 2013, Mercer participated in the federal H-2A program, which permitted Mercer to hire foreign workers to fill temporary agricultural positions at an hourly wage of $12.

Plaintiffs brought a putative class action, claiming that Mercer had a common policy or practice of failing to inform domestic farm workers of the availability of H-2A work that paid $12 per hour, in violation of the Agricultural Workers’ Protection Act (AWPA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1831 (e) and 1821(f), and the Washington Consumer Protection Act (CPA), Wash. Rev. Code § 19.86.020 . In addition, Plaintiffs alleged that Mercer failed .to pay its own domestic workers $12 per hour when they carried out the same tasks as foreign H-2A workers, in violation of AWPA and state wage laws.

The district court certified an Inaccurate Information class and an Equal Pay subclass, corresponding to Plaintiffs’ claims. We affirm the district court’s class…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.