Cruz

People v. Cruz

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 2016F069940California4,684 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

discussion of the first point because the specific issue with the instruction appears to be novel and because a pattern instruction, CALJIC No. 2.50.01, is affected.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Cruz was arrested after one of the victims reported abuse to her grandmother. The district attorney filed an information charging him with committing violations of section 288, subdivision (a), with C.H. on February 19, 2013; with L.S. on September 17- 18, 2012; and with D.R. on September 16-17, 2012. The information alleged that the current offenses had been committed against multiple victims. (§ 667.61, subd. (e)(4).) It also alleged that Cruz had two prior convictions: unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor (§ 261.5) and failing to stop at the scene of an accident in which someone had been injured or killed (Veh. Code, § 20001, subd. (a)). The three victims, D.R., L.S. and C.H., testified at trial. D.R. testified that in September of 2012, when she was 13, she was living with her grandmother in Bakersfield. Cruz was D.R.’s aunt’s boyfriend. On September 17, D.R. was in her bedroom alone when Cruz entered. Cruz said he wanted the phone number of D.R.’s friend, L.S., and he would rape…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.