Randle

Filed 8/31/16 Randle v. Davis CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

JEREMIAH RANDLE, B262277

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC404955) v.

ROOSEVELT DAVIS,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Holly E. Kendig, Judge. Affirmed.

Jeremiah Randle, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Fidelity National Law Group and Teresa Y. Hillery, for Defendant and Respondent.

_______________________________________ Plaintiff and appellant Jeremiah Randle challenges a trial court order granting defendant Roosevelt Davis’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, based on res judicata. As we understand his arguments,…