People v. Dempsey CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 2016H042029California3,828 words

Opinion

Opinion

Manoukian, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

After the trial court denied her motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5, subd. (a)(1)), defendant Kirstin Ann Dempsey pleaded no contest to possession of heroin for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351) and admitted that she had two prior convictions of narcotics offenses (Health & Saf. Code, § 11370.2, subd. (a)). Defendant was sentenced to a nine-year prison term, comprised of a three-year term for the substantive offense and consecutive three-year terms for the two prior conviction allegations. On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred by denying her motion to suppress evidence. Defendant argues that although there was a valid warrant authorizing the police to search for and seize defendant at her home and in her vehicle, the warrant did not authorize a search of her person, nor her seizure at a different location: the sheriff’s office. Defendant similarly contends that although the warrant authorized a search for cellular phones, it did not authorize a search of her cell phone. Additionally, defendant contends the trial court did not follow the proper procedures for conducting an in camera review of the sealed portion of the search…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.