Rahman

Rahman v. Capital One CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 2016F070066California3,292 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/31/16 Rahman v. Capital One CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

SUMAIRA RAHMAN et al.,

F070066

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. S-1500-CV-279480) v.

CAPITAL ONE, N.A. et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. David R. Lampe, Judge. Sumaira Rahman and Syed Rahman, in pro per. for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Doll Amir & Eley, Hunter Ely and Connie Tcheng for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo- Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment entered against them after defendants’ demurrer to their complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiffs assert the elements of the causes of action in their complaint were sufficiently alleged, but fail to address…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.