Radakovic

Radakovic v. County of Los Angeles CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 2016B266194California3,764 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baker, J.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Plaintiffs’ Complaints Radakovic and Rougeau both worked as nurses for the County, albeit at different facilities. According to plaintiffs, after Radakovic’s supervisor, Katty Callender (Callender), learned Radakovic, a Hispanic woman, was married to Rougeau, who is African American, Callender engaged in the following acts from mid-2010 to mid-2011, all of which Radakovic alleged to be discriminatory and retaliatory: forcing Radakovic to remove family photos from her office area, denying her requested vacation time off,

1 Undesignated statutory references that follow are to the Government Code. 2 Multiple documents that were filed in the trial court are not in the record on appeal. Our summary of the relevant background facts is taken primarily from plaintiffs’ 2013 complaint and, where the evidence appears to be undisputed, from the County’s separate statement of material facts submitted in support of its motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs did not include their own separate statement, or any response to the County’s, in the record. 2 issuing evaluations of Radakovic’s work performance that were more negative than those she received prior to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.