Humski

Humski v. Khem CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 2016B264755California3,774 words

Opinion

Opinion

Willhite, J.

Filed 9/2/16 Humski v. Khem CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

BRANKO HUMSKI, B264755

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NC059611) v.

BUNNEANG KHEM et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael P. Vicencia, Judge. Affirmed. Albert Lon Chaney III for Plaintiff and Appellant. Bissell and Associates, Olivia O. Bissell; Smythe Law Group, Inc., and Michelle J. Smythe for Defendants and Respondents. Branko Humski appeals from an order denying his petition to compel arbitration of this lawsuit that he filed against respondents Bunneang and Sophany Khem, individually and as trustees of respondent The Khem…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.