A.R.

A.R. v. L.N. CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 2016B266618California1,895 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grimes, J.

BACKGROUND

Some of the following facts are from our earlier unpublished opinion and are provided for context only. (A.R. v. L.N., supra, B259753.) “On July 18, 2011, father commenced this paternity action against mother to establish a parental relationship with the parties’ minor child. The parties entered into a stipulation establishing father’s paternity on September 30, 2011. Thereafter, the litigation became contentious, with numerous modifications of the court’s temporary custody and visitation orders. “The trial on custody took place on April 24, 25, May 1, 2, 15, and 16, 2014. On July 10, 2014, the trial court issued a lengthy statement of decision providing the parties with joint legal and physical custody of the child, and establishing a visitation schedule. The statement of decision reserved decision on the issues of child support and attorney fees. The trial court’s statement of decision specified: ‘Orders for child support and

Respondent Feinberg, Mindel, Brandt & Klein, LLP has requested that we take judicial notice of our earlier opinion. We grant the request. Respondent Feinberg, Mindel, Brandt & Klein, LLP filed a substantive respondent’s brief, to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.