United States v. Kenneth Door

Good Law
668 F. App'x 784
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 7, 201614-30170California119 words

Opinion

ORDER

The court’s memorandum disposition filed on April 5, 2016, is hereby amended by deleting “As the Vasquez exception does not apply, we decline to review the forfeited claim,” which is at the end of Paragraph 2, and adding the following language, which shall be placed immediately before Paragraph 3:

Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing is DENIED.

The full court has been advised of the Petition for Rehearing En Banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the Petition for Rehearing En Banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing En Banc is therefore DENIED.

Appellant may not file a subsequent petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Ninth Circuit General Order 5.3(a)(2).