Tevis

Tevis v. Spare Time, Inc. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 2016C074938California12,659 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/8/16 Tevis v. Spare Time, Inc. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

KELLY TEVIS, C074938

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 34201100116411CUWTGDS) v.

SPARE TIME, INC., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

The trial court granted summary adjudication of all 10 causes of action in plaintiff Kelly Tevis’s complaint against her former employer, Spare Time, Inc. (the Company), and her supervisor, Joe Rose (Rose). We affirm the summary adjudication of the causes of action arising from Rose’s alleged sexual harassment, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress based on the running of the statute of limitations, fatal admissions by plaintiff, and a failure of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.