In Re Grand Jury Investigation V.
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
SEP 08 2016
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION Nos. 16-50234 16-55640
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, D.C. No. 2:15-cm-01014-UA-
Appellee,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
DOE APPELLANTS AND
CORPORATIONS,
Respondents-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 31, 2016** Pasadena, California
Before: SILVERMAN, FISHER, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Page 2 of 4 1. Under Perlman v. United States, 247 U.S. 7 (1918), we have jurisdiction
to review the order requiring production of documents entered on June 27, 2016.
Because appellants’ former attorneys would likely produce the allegedly privileged
documents to the government rather than risk a contempt…