Laborers International Union etc. v. County of Riverside CA4/2
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 2016E063886California4,268 words
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Samuel Merenda was employed as an investigator by the office of the
Riverside County Public Defender (OPD). His employment was terminated after he
wrote a memorandum damaging his credibility as an investigator. In the concluding
sentence of the memorandum—which documented his conversation with a witness in a
murder case—he wrote: “Let me know if you want an ‘interview’ report and I’ll get you
one, minus the confession.” On appeal, Merenda asserts he did not expect a “one-
sentence joke . . . to cost him his career.”
Merenda appeals from the judgment denying his petition for writ of mandate. We
find that substantial evidence supports the trial court’s ruling. We affirm the judgment.
II
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Merenda served in the Air Force and then worked for the San Bernardino County
Sheriff for 20 years. In 2003, he began working for the OPD. His employment was
terminated on August 23, 2012.
As an investigator, Merenda’s duties included locating and investigating
witnesses, preparing written reports, and testifying. He prepared two types of written
reports: 1) investigative, or interview, reports, and 2) confidential memoranda.…