People v. Farias CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 2016F072032California1,755 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

As part of a plea bargain, on May 13, 2014, appellant Stephanie Ashley Farias pled to four felony counts and a misdemeanor, with a three-year sentencing “lid” and no initial state prison term. Farias was placed on felony probation, which eventually was revoked on June 2, 2015, and the trial court imposed a term of incarceration. Farias asserts the trial court erred in imposing a felony sentence on two counts, receiving stolen property and unlawful acquisition of credit card information, because Proposition 47 sentencing applies and there is insufficient evidence the offenses involved a value of over $950. We conclude the trial court did not err and affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

On January 31, 2014, a felony complaint was filed as case No. F14901100, charging Farias in counts 1 and 2 with identity theft with a prior conviction (Pen. Code,1 § 530.5, subd. (c)(2)); count 3 charged unlawful acquisition of credit card information (§ 484e, subd. (d)); count 4 charged receiving stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a)); and in count 5 with forgery (§ 475, subd. (b)). It also was alleged as to count 1, that Farias committed the offense while on bail or own recognizance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.