Tiffany F. v. Superior Court CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 2016F073854California1,713 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/12/16 Tiffany F. v. Superior Court CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

TIFFANY F.,

F073854

Petitioner, (Super. Ct. Nos. 517233, 517234, v. 517235, 517232)

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF STANISLAUS

COUNTY, OPINION Respondent;

STANISLAUS COUNTY COMMUNITY

SERVICES AGENCY,

Real Parties in Interest.

THE COURT*

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING; petition for extraordinary writ review. Ann Q. Ameral, Judge. TIFFANY F., in pro. per. for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. John P. Doering, county Counsel, and Maria E. Ratliff, Deputy County Counsel for Real Party in Interest. -ooOoo-

* Before Kane, Acting P.J., Poochigian, J. and Franson, J. Tiffany F.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.