Schapiro-Thorn

Schapiro-Thorn v. Mitchell CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 2016A146381California700 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pollak, J.

Filed 9/13/16 Schapiro-Thorn v. Mitchell CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

SCHAPIRO-THORN, INC.,

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, A146381

v. (City & County of San Francisco DANIEL L. MITCHELL, Super. Ct. No. CGC-09-495377) Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

This is one more in a series of frivolous appeals by defendant and cross- complainant Daniel L. Mitchell seeking to forestall reckoning for attorney fees he has been held to owe the law firm of Schapiro-Thorn, Inc. (See Schapiro-Thorn, Inc. v. Daniel L. Mitchell (April 21, 2015, A140800 [nonpub. opn.]); Michael…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.