Fricks

Fricks v. Superior Court CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 2016B265309California5,286 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/15/16 Fricks v. Superior Court CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

MARQUE D. FRICKS, B265309

Petitioner, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BH010027) v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES

COUNTY,

Respondent;

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,

Real Party in Interest.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, William C. Ryan, Judge, treated as petition for writ of mandate. Petition granted. Rich Pfeiffer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Jennifer A. Neill, Assistant Attorney General, Julie A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.