Manuel Tarango, Jr. v. E. McDaniel

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 201613-17071California11,536 words

Opinion

Opinion

MURGUIA, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MANUEL TARANGO, JR., No. 13-17071 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:10-cv-00146-RCJ-VPC

E. K. MCDANIEL; NEVADA

ATTORNEY GENERAL, ORDER AND

Respondents-Appellees. AMENDED OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 12, 2014 San Francisco, California

Filed March 3, 2016 Amended September 16, 2016

Before: Raymond C. Fisher, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges.

Order; Opinion by Judge Murguia; Dissent by Judge Rawlinson SUMMARY*

Habeas Corpus

The panel filed (1) an order amending its opinion and accompanying dissent and denying a petition for panel rehearing and a petition for rehearing en banc and (2) an amended opinion and dissent in a habeas corpus case.

In the amended opinion, the panel vacated the district court’s denial of a habeas corpus petition, in which a Nevada state prisoner claimed violation of his due process right to a fair and impartial jury, where a police vehicle followed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.