Randall

Randall v. Mousseau

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 2016B263945MCalifornia2,384 words

Opinion

Opinion

Zelon, J.

Filed 9/16/16 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

WENDY RANDALL, B263945

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC458630) v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

GEOFFREY MOUSSEAU, (NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT)

Defendant and Respondent.

THE COURT:

IT IS ORDERED that the published opinion filed herein on August 24, 2016, be modified as follows:

1. On page 6 at the end of footnote 5, the following language has been added:

“Appellant has not identified any error in the denial of that motion other than the issues raised with respect to the judgment. As set forth above, the record is insufficient to resolve those claims.”

The foregoing does not affect a change in the judgment. Appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied.

________________________________________________________________________ PERLUSS, P. J., ZELON, J., GARNETT, J. (Assigned) Filed 8/24/16 (unmodified version)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.