Salinas v. Bank of New York Mellon CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 2016E060651California1,649 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On June 23, 2005, plaintiff obtained a loan in the amount of $632,572, used to

purchase certain real property in Riverside, California, and secured by a deed of trust

recorded against the property. MERS is identified as “beneficiary” and “nominee for

Lender and Lender’s successors and assignees” in the deed of trust. MERS, acting as

1 This entity is defendant and respondent The Bank of New York Mellon, f/k/a The Bank of New York Mellon, as Successor-in-interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities, Bear Stearns ALT-A Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-2 (BONY Trust).

2This is defendant California Reconveyance Company, which filed a declaration of nonmonetary status in the trial court, and is not a party to this appeal.

In this opinion, except where specifically noted, we use the term “defendants” to refer to those defendants who are also respondents.

2 nominee for the lender, assigned the loan to BONY Trust on March 27, 2012. On

June 26, 2012, BONY Trust designated California Reconveyance Corporation as trustee

under the deed of trust.

On June 27, 2012, a notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.