Denney

Denney v. CSX Transportation CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 2016E064240California1,489 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

According to plaintiff’s complaint, on December 29, 2012, he was working at a

rail yard in Mira Loma, California, for his employer Caliber Auto Transfer. As part of

his duties, he attempted to open an auto carrier, but found the door to be stuck. He was

injured while attempting to apply force to the door mechanism with his foot, striking the

back of his knee against a sharp edge, apparently created by previous use of a pry bar to

open the door mechanism. It is undisputed, at least for purposes of the motion to quash at

issue here, that CSX owns the auto carrier or “rack” that plaintiff was attempting to open

when he was injured (it does not own the rail car on which the rack sat).

Plaintiff filed suit on October 10, 2014, asserting causes of action under the

Federal Employers’ Liability Act and the Federal Locomotive Inspection Act, as well as

state negligence law. On March 2, 2015, plaintiff amended the complaint to name one of

the Doe defendants to be CSX.

CSX, appearing specially, filed its motion to quash on June 8, 2015. The motion

was supported by the declaration of its “General Commerce Counsel and Corporate

2 Secretary,”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.