United States v. Norma Barrancas-Sanchez

Good Law
657 F. App'x 713
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 201614-50249California302 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Norma Margarita Barrancas-Sanchez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 68-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate and remand for resentenc-ing.

Barrancas-Sanchez argues that the district court erred in denying a minor role reduction to her base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). After Barrancas-San-chez was sentenced, the United States Sentencing Commission issued Amendment 794 (“the Amendment”), which amended the commentary to the minor role Guideline. The Amendment is retroactive to cases pending -on direct appeal. See United States v. Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d 519, 523 (9th Cir. 2016).

The Amendment clarified that, in assessing whether a defendant should receive a minor role adjustment, the court should compare her to the other participants in the crime, rather than to a hypothetical average participant. See U.S.S.G. App. C. Amend. 794; Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d at 523 . In addition, the Amendment clarified that “[t]he fact that a defendant performs an essential or indispensable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.