W.M.

W.M. v. S.F. CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 2016G050068California2,129 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bedsworth, J.

Filed 9/20/16 W.M. v. S.F. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

W. M.,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G050068

v. (Super. Ct. No. 98P001103)

S. F., OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from orders of the Superior Court of Orange County, Ronald P. Kreber, Judge. Appeal dismissed in part as moot; remaining orders affirmed. S.F., in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. Dickens wrote about a fictional case, Jarndyce v. Jarndyce, in which the legal fees incurred fighting over an inheritance completely ate up the inheritance, leaving the parties nothing. This unhappy and frankly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.