Nmfs

United Cook Inlet Drift Ass'n v. National Marine Fisheries Service

Good Law
837 F.3d 1055·2016 WL 5112031·46 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20155·2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17228
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 201614-35928California4,494 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hurwitz, J.

The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1801-91 (“Magnuson-Stevens Act,” or “the Act”), creates a “national program for the conservation and management of the fishery resources of the United States.” Id. § 1801(a)(6). The Act establishes eight Regional Fishery Management Councils, each of which “shall” prepare a fishery management plan (“FMP”) “for each fishery under its authority that requires conservation and management.” Id. § 1852(a), (h)(1). The Secretary of Commerce,, acting through the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”), then reviews each FMP or amendment of a plan “to determine whether it is consistent with the [Act’s] national standards, the other provisions of this chapter, and any other applicable law,” 16 U.S.C. § 1854 (a)(1). See Or. Trailers Ass’n v. Gutierrez, 452 F.3d 1104, 1108 (9th Cir. 2006).

The issue for decision is whether NMFS can exempt a fishery under its authority that requires conservation and management from an' FMP because the agency is content with State management. The district court held that' it could. We disagree, and reverse.

BACKGROUND

I. Factual and Legislative Background

Cook Inlet is one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.