Estate of Bruce Barton v. Adt Security Services Pension
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ESTATE OF BRUCE H. BARTON,* No. 13-56379 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:12-cv-06971-
BRO-CW
ADT SECURITY SERVICES PENSION
PLAN, a pension plan; TYCO
INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT ORDER
COMPANY, as plan sponsor; TYCO
INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT
COMPANY, LLC, Administrative Committee, Defendants-Appellees.
Filed September 20, 2016
Before: Alex Kozinski, Sandra S. Ikuta, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges.
Order; Dissent by Judge N.R. Smith
* The Estate of Bruce H. Barton is substituted as Plaintiff-Appellant pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(a). SUMMARY**
Employee Retirement Income Security Act
The panel denied a petition for panel rehearing and, on behalf of the court, denied a petition for rehearing en banc in an ERISA case.
Dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, Judge N.R. Smith, joined by Judges O’Scannlain, Gould, Tallman, Bybee, Callahan, Bea and Ikuta, wrote that the panel’s opinion ignored Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit precedent in placing on the ERISA plan administrator the burden…