Hackard

Hackard v. Holt CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2016C075578California5,746 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

Filed 9/21/16 Hackard v. Holt CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

MICHAEL A. HACKARD,

Petitioner and Respondent, C075578

v. (Super. Ct. No. 34200800021853CUCOGDS) JULIAN HOLT et al., as Co-administrators, etc.,

Objectors and Appellants;

SUSAN SMITH, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc.,

Respondent.

In 2008, Michael A. Hackard sued Theodor J. Holt (his law partner) and Hackard & Holt (the law partnership) based on allegations Holt was unable to manage the partnership. Hackard obtained a preliminary injunction that barred Holt from interfering with management of the partnership. The trial court conditioned the preliminary

1 injunction on Hackard posting a $100,000 undertaking. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.