People v. Tejeda CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2016D068737California1,218 words

Opinion

Opinion

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The facts underlying the offenses in this case are essentially not in dispute.

Accordingly, we will adopt the brief summary of the facts as contained in the

respondent's brief.

In December 1994 appellant entered a GTM convenience store with a friend, took

a bag of popcorn and consumed it without paying for it. When appellant and the friend

approached the front door and attempted to leave, the manager confronted them about the

popcorn, but appellant and the friend denied consuming it.

Appellant consented to a pat search of his pockets, and when the manager did so,

he felt a metal object which turned out to be a gun. Appellant and the manager struggled

over the gun, but the manager obtained possession of it. The manager solicited help from

a San Diego County Sheriff's deputy who happened to be in the parking lot, and the

deputy removed a magazine with four hollow point rounds from appellant's fully

operational nine-millimeter semiautomatic gun.

A search of appellant produced two wallets, one of which contained .01 grams of

methamphetamine. Appellant said he was holding the gun for a friend who went to

Mexico.

DISCUSSION

In this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.