People v. Flechsenhaar CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
This case arose out of a road rage incident, which included a collision and
altercation between Jarret Flechsenhaar and another driver. Police officers responded to
the scene and, after an investigation, the other driver requested an investigating officer to
make a citizen's arrest of Flechsenhaar. When the officer approached Flechsenhaar, he
became agitated, refused to sit down when asked to do so, and swatted the officer's hand
away. Flechsenhaar swore and struggled with several responding officers as they
attempted to detain him. A jury convicted Flechsenhaar of resisting an executive officer
by means of threats and violence. (Pen. Code, § 69; count 1.)1 The court sentenced him
to 180 days in jail, but stayed the sentence pending successful completion of three years
of probation. On appeal, Flechsenhaar contends the court abused its discretion in two
ways: (1) by allowing an officer to testify regarding statements made by the other driver
during the investigation for the limited purpose of explaining the officers' subsequent
conduct; and (2) by denying Flechsenhaar's motion to reduce his offense to a
misdemeanor. We conclude the…