Pourteymour

Pourteymour v. Mani CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 2016D067225California613 words

Opinion

Opinion

Benke, J.

Filed 9/26/16 Pourteymour v. Mani CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

RAMIN POURTEYMOUR, D067225

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00100146-

CU-DF-CTL)

NASRIN MANI,

Defendant and Respondent.

NASRIN MANI, D067281

Cross-complainant and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00100146-

CU-DF-CTL)

RAMIN POURTEYMOUR,

Cross-defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Kevin A.

Enright, Judge. Affirmed. Friedhofer, James Friedhofer; Law Office of Douglas R. Reynolds, Douglas R.

Reynolds; Horvitz & Levy, Peter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.