People v. Ferguson CA2/7

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent Ferguson on appeal. After examining the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues. On May 31, 2016 we advised Ferguson he had 30 days to submit any arguments or raise any issues he wanted us to consider. We have not received a response. We have examined the record and are satisfied that appellate counsel for Ferguson has fully complied with his responsibilities and that there are no arguable issues. (See Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 277-284 [120 S.Ct. 746, 145 L.Ed.2d 756]; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 112-113; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

2

DISPOSITION

The order is affirmed.

SEGAL, J.

We concur:

PERLUSS, P. J.

GARNETT, J.*

* Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

3