Killion

Killion v. Lacazotte CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 2016C076817California2,597 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

On April 21, 2014, Stanley, age 76, filed a request for a restraining order against Agee pursuant to section 15657.03. In a declaration attached to the request, Stanley averred that Lacazotte and her companion, John Agee, were former tenants, having leased certain real property from him in Copperopolis. Stanley and Maxine also enjoyed a social relationship with Lacazotte and Agee. Lacazotte and Agee visited the Killions at their home in Sonora on several occasions. On one occasion, Lacazotte offered to “clean” the Killions’ computer. The computer contained the Killions’ personal financial information. Lacazotte took the computer and apparently never returned it. On another occasion, Lacazotte and Agee borrowed a silver concho belt and sewing machine, together with other miscellaneous items. These items were never returned. Later, the Killions discovered that documents attesting to the registration and pedigree of certain livestock had been removed from a file cabinet in their home. The declaration implies – but does not expressly state – that Lacazotte and Agee used the stolen documents to facilitate the unauthorized sale of a horse and two foals that belonged to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.