People v. Sutton CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 2016C081915California607 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/26/16 P. v. Sutton CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yuba) ----

THE PEOPLE, C081915

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CRF15606)

v.

KEVIN DANIEL SUTTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

“On November 4, 2014, the voters enacted Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act (hereafter Proposition 47), which went into effect the next day. (Cal. Const., art. II, § 10, subd. (a).)” (People v. Rivera (2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 1085, 1089.) Proposition 47 created a resentencing provision, codified at Penal Code section 1170.18,1 which provides that a person currently serving a sentence for certain designated felonies may petition for recall of the sentence to reduce felonies to misdemeanors.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.