People v. Thavong CA1/3

Discussion We have reviewed the entire record and conclude there are no arguable issues that warrant further briefing. Defendant was ably represented by counsel at every stage of the proceedings. His plea was entered freely and knowingly with the concurrence and advice of counsel. The court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to strike his prior conviction and no errors appear in the calculation of sentence. Consecutive enhancements were properly imposed for the separate aspects of the crime of personally inflicting great bodily injury upon one victim and injuring an additional victim. (People v. Arndt (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 387, 393-394.) Disposition The judgment is affirmed. The clerk of the superior court is directed to amend the July 12, 2016 abstract of judgment to reflect that the one-year enhancement was imposed pursuant to Vehicle Code section 23558 and to send a certified copy of the amended abstract to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

1 At one point in the reporter’s transcript, the principal offense is misstated as a violation of Vehicle Code section 23152, subdivision (b). The correct section reference is Vehicle Code 23153,…