Angela Ebner v. Fresh, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 201613-56644California4,453 words
Opinion
Opinion
TASHIMA, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANGELA EBNER, No. 13-56644 Plaintiff-Appellant, DC No. v. 8:13 cv-00477 JVS
FRESH, INC., a Delaware Corporation, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellee. AMENDED
OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted January 11, 2016 Pasadena, California
Filed March 17, 2016 Amended September 27, 2016
Before: Jerome Farris, A. Wallace Tashima, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.
Order; Opinion by Judge Tashima EBNER V. FRESH, INC.
SUMMARY*
California Law
The panel denied a petition for panel rehearing, denied on behalf of the court a petition for rehearing en banc, withdrew the opinion filed on March 17, 2016, and filed an amended opinion affirming the district court’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of a plaintiff’s putative consumer class action alleging that cosmetics and skin care products manufacturer Fresh, Inc., deceived consumers about the quantity of lip balm in its Sugar Lip Treatment product line.