In re C.G. CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 2016A145626California6,257 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bruiniers, J.

I. BACKGROUND

In the fall of 2014, Mother and Father were living separately in Eureka. In early December, the police were notified after Mother called staff at the University of California, San Francisco to cancel a medical appointment and said “she was in a motel with [Daughter] and had to stay there so [they] did not infect anyone. [Mother] said, ‘I can’t handle it anymore,’ ‘I don’t think we are going to make it.’ [She] said there were bugs crawling under her and her child’s skin and coming out of the child’[s] eyes and ears. [She] said the child had a ‘green glowing stuff’ coming from her body the previous night that [she] looked at under a microscope and saw it was ‘hexagonal and shining like crystal.’ ” After Mother and Daughter were located in a Santa Rosa hotel, Sonoma County Child Welfare Services investigated and reported that Mother “moved out of her home [in Eureka] because she thought she and the baby were being infected by bugs in her home and she ha[d] been staying in hotels in the Eureka area. Today [Mother] took the baby and drove to Santa Rosa to find new medical providers . . . [and] checked into [a motel] in Santa Rosa. [¶] . . . [¶] . . . [Mother]…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.