Hakim

Hakim v. Beshay CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 2016B260468California14,979 words

Opinion

Opinion

Zelon, J.

Filed 9/27/16 Hakim v. Beshay CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

SUZAN HAKIM,

B260468

Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC419205) v.

MAGED BESHAY, et al.,

Defendants, Cross-Complainants and Appellants.

MAGED BESHAY, et al., B265065

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC557681) v.

SUZAN HAKIM,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment and orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Yvette M. Palazuelos and Dalila C. Lyons, Judges. Judgment in No. B260468 affirmed in part and modified; order on attorney fees and nonstatutory costs affirmed. Order in No. B265065…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.