People v. Johnson CA6

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Cedric Chester Johnson appeals from final judgments related to four criminal actions. Appointed counsel filed an opening brief summarizing the cases but raising no issues. We notified defendant of his right to submit written argument on his own behalf. Defendant responded by filing a supplemental brief. Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we have reviewed the appellate records in their entirety and find no arguable issues on appeal. Following the California Supreme Court’s direction in Kelly, we provide “a brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case[s], the crimes of which the defendant was convicted, and the punishment imposed.” (Id. at p. 110.) We discuss defendant’s contentions and explain why we will affirm the judgments. (Ibid.)

II. DISCUSSION

A. H041579

Defendant was charged with assault with a deadly weapon on a peace officer (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (c)), with two prior prison terms (§ 667.5, subd. (b)).1 According to the preliminary hearing transcript, in August 2013 officers were dispatched to a residence to respond to a possible restraining order violation.…