United States v. Mildred Karen Woods, Cathy Lynn Goldstein

Caution
720 F.2d 1022·1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15278
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 15, 198383-5006, 83-5007California4,343 words

Opinion

Opinion

Alarcon, J.

Mildred Karen Woods and Cathy Lynn Goldstein appeal from the judgment of conviction of each for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute. Goldstein also appeals from the judgment of conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute.

We are asked to reverse the judgment on the ground that the district court erred in denying each appellant’s motion to suppress evidence essential to prove their guilt of each crime. Our independent review of the record has persuaded us that the district court properly denied the motion to suppress.

We must look to the totality of the circumstances known to the officers prior to the challenged searches and seizures in order to decide if their conduct was consistent with the demands of the fourth amendment.

I.

PERTINENT FACTS

Woods and Goldstein were arrested on August 30, 1982 at the San Diego Airport by members of the Narcotics Task Force Unit of the San Diego Sheriff’s Department. Four or five months earlier, Cory Lerner, the district manager of an air force cargo service, voluntarily contacted Larry Lundsford, a deputy sheriff assigned to the Narcotics Task Force. Lerner stated he wanted to give information…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.