Robert HADDAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee

Good Law
720 F.2d 1454·32 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,943·33 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 553·1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14995
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 28, 198381-5041California3,394 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nelson, J.

Appellant Robert Haddad appeals from the district court’s judgment on his national origin discrimination claim, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (1976 & Supp. V 1981), and from the jury’s verdict on his age discrimination in employment claim, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (1976 & Supp. Y 1981). Both claims arise from the same allegedly improper acts by appellee Lockheed. Despite the admission of improper evidence at trial, we affirm both the court’s judgment and the jury’s verdict.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant Robert Haddad worked for ap-pellee Lockheed California Corporation from early 1969 until his resignation in July 1979. Appellant claims that while in Lockheed’s employ he was subject to a variety of forms of disparate treatment. This treatment, appellant alleged below, was the product of discrimination on the basis of national origin and age.

After filing a timely charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and receiving statutory notice of final action from the Commission, appellant initiated the present lawsuit in the Central District of California. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(4) (1976), appellant’s claim of discrimination based on national origin…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.