Robert E. Badham v. United States District Court For The Northern District Of California

Good Law
721 F.2d 1170
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 198383-7487California5,177 words

Opinion

Opinion

721 F.2d 1170 Robert E. BADHAM, Robert W. Naylor, Eric Seastrand, Aldo Silvestri, Michael W. Cobb, Frank O. Verlot, Donna S. Richardson, Peter Schrager, Jane Baker, Charles A. Meyer, Kirk Lindsey, Donald Driscoll, Roger T. Erickson, D.D.S., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, and March Fong Eu, Secretary of State of the State of California, Real Party in Interest. No. 83-7487. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 10, 1983. Decided Sept. 26, 1983. Rehearing Denied Dec. 12, 1983. James R. Parrinello, Dobbs, & Nielsen, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners. Robert E. Murphy, Joseph Remcho, Remcho, Johansen & Purcell, San Francisco, Cal., Jonathan H. Steinberg, Irell & Manella, Los Angeles, Cal., Joseph Remcho, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before DUNIWAY, WALLACE, and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. WALLACE, Circuit Judge: 1 Registered Republican voters in several congressional districts in the State of California (the Republicans) challenge California Assembly Bill 2X, a congressional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.