M.P. Doran, James A. Scott and James H. Bailey, Cross-Appellants v. F.H. Houle and James W. Glosser, Cross-Appellees

Good Law
721 F.2d 1182
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 198382-3445, 82-3457 and 82-3465California2,552 words

Opinion

Opinion

Taylor, J.

Three Montana veterinarians brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Constitution against two government officials, Dr. Glosser who was employed by the state of Montana, and Dr. Houle who was employed by the federal government. The complaint alleged a conspiracy to deprive plaintiffs of certain government issued permits without due process of law. The permits in question, which were part of a joint federal-state disease eradication program, allowed the holder to perform a specific test for brucellosis in cattle. Plaintiffs obtained a substantial judgment following a jury trial and defendants appealed. We reverse on the basis that plaintiffs had no constitutionally protected interest in the permits.

OVERVIEW

Brucellosis is a highly contagious and infectious bacterial disease. It occurs primarily in cattle, causing reproductive failure and the abortion of calves. Testimony at trial indicated that, by comparison, brucel-losis is presently a greater threat to ranchers than anthrax or hoof-and-mouth disease. Brucellosis can also cause undulant fever and other ill effects in humans.

Montana is particularly vulnerable to this disease as cattle ranching is a major industry in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.