The Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation v. Thomas Ralph Adsit, San Carlos Apache Tribe of Arizona v. The State of Arizona, Navajo Nation v. United States of America

Good Law
721 F.2d 1187
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 198380-5189California809 words

Opinion

Opinion

721 F.2d 1187 The NORTHERN CHEYENNE TRIBE OF the NORTHERN CHEYENNE INDIAN RESERVATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas Ralph ADSIT, et al., Defendants-Appellees. SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE OF ARIZONA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The STATE OF ARIZONA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. NAVAJO NATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 79-4887, 80-3028, 80-3032, 80-3038, 80-3040, 80-3041, 80-3042, 80-3044, 80-3045, 80-3061, 80-3062, 80-3063, 80-5137, 80-5138, 80-5189, 80-5219, 80-5471 and 80-5837. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Dec. 9, 1983. Thomas H. Pacheco, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for U.S. Jeanne S. Whiteing, John E. Echohawk, Boulder, Colo., Calvin Wilson, Busby, Mont., for Cheyenne Tribe. R. Anthony Rogers, John Michael Facciola, Glenn P. Sugameli, Wilkinson, Cragun & Barker, Washington, D.C., Thomas J. Lynaugh, Lynaugh, Fitzgerald, Schoppert & Skaggs, Billings, Mont., for Crow Tribe and The Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes. Reid Peyton Chambers, Sonosky, Chambers & Sachse, Washington, D.C., for Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes, intervenors. Steven L. Bunch, Montana Legal Services Ass'n, Helena,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.