Edward Furnace v. G. Giurbino

Good Law
838 F.3d 1019·2016 WL 5439760·2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17651
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 29, 201613-17620California4,386 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bybee, J.

Edward Furnace is a prisoner at Salinas Valley State Prison. Furnace alleges the Appellees wrongfully classified him as a gang member in retaliation for filing a § 1983 suit against the defendants’ colleagues. After Furnace filed a habeas petition, California courts rejected his claims on the ground that there was sufficient evidence to support the gang validation. Furnace then filed the present action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of his Fourteenth Amendment rights, based on violation of the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause. The district court dismissed his suit on claim preclusion grounds. We affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS .BELOW

In 2006 Furnace filed a § 1983 suit against eleven Salinas Valley Prison officials (none of whom is involved in this suit) for allegedly denying him visitation rights and other privileges. These defendants filed a motion to dismiss in '2008, which was denied. Furnace alleges that shortly after that, R.L. Martinez and M. Valdez, gang investigators at Salinas Valley, were “ordered to validate [Furnace] as a prison gang member to intimidate and retaliate against him” for filing the earlier suit. The decision to classify…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.